are wonton wrappers the same as dumpling wrapperswhy didn't steve downs get custody

why didn't steve downs get custodyark breeding settings spreadsheet

And to say that her mental health has degraded is an understatement, but more reason not to keep her eternally incarcerated. The fact that they used her daughter and lied about the gun they could never find makes it a wrongful conviction. What got her convicted was two things the towel and Christie. We will never know what really happened because the authorities acted too hastily and the media was a huge hindrance. Which is itself a redundant practise: the blogger repeatedly states that Downs should be released. Rule defended her right to earn a living and to tell her story. Her trial was speculative and based on so many fallacies. But before you get too deep into the drug stuff with Van Houten, she chose to take drugs. (that one is more of a question). I do have to take issue with this article about Diane Downs. She could not have been shot twice in the back while sitting up and have the bullet pierce her body to end up under the floorboard of the passenger side. The blogger continues, I am not one sided. The best policy for Diane Downs would have been to remain silent, but she fought back and smiled at the wrong time and according to them, enjoyed the attention. Lets not take that lightly. Weve become friends. Yes, like many Americans, I think that the US system is barbaric. I would also like to express my disbelief that the same judge presided over both the child welfare case and the criminal one. Yes, I usually answer the emails I get about the blogs. Is there any update? I believe DDs case needs to be re looked at and all evidence reviewed. But without proof, Diane couldnt implicate Steve Downs any more than she could shoot him as he violated a restraining order threatening to beat her AGAIN. It does not get any bigger than this. I do not post rude comments. The authorities believed that the children's father was not a good fit to look after the children after what they had endured when their mother tried to murder them. It is documented in the blog where I give the source In the 1996 Federal Petition, you can find the Anatomy of Brainwashing that can answer any question on this subject. There isnt a whole lot known about where Steve Downs is these days. Hello. And if the fact that cops lied about the gun to close the deal did not bother you, it bothered me because this is not due process. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZPLkIcSzftE&ab_channel=DianeDownsArchives. Why? Every time, she said she did not know, they told her to think again and made suggestions. But he overestimated the kind of people that would go along with this soap opera. Nevertheless, Steve and Diane tied the knot on November 13, 1973. The tape is real and probably not admissible, but it seems to indicate that her testimony was coerced. But in their defense, they were told at trial what gun was used by Diane to shoot the kids and it must have been very difficult to overcome the emotions brought on by the words of little Christie even if it was pretty obvious during her testimony that she was confused and unreliable. Unfortunately, Danny Downs was permanently paralyzed from the waist down because of a bullet injury in his back. A history of use of drugs, alcohol or even cigarettes can all be deemed as counts against a parent in court. The character of the accused is not the main ingredient, especially that in this case, there was a lot of bashing going on in the media and in court. Considering that the marks on the lethal bullets did not fit the bullet fingerprinting found in the rifle, this gun switcheroo was a good save for the state, but did not support the theory presented at trial either. I ndicted money launderer and noted coup enthusiast Steve Bannon has refused to sit for a deposition in front of the January 6 Select Committee. Lack of impulse control is also another symptom that might explain why a mother would stop at night to help a stranger flagging her on the road. That was the extent of her investigation of Dianes side. Mr. It was a dark and rural road. If you listen to the recording, Christie clearly says I dont know who did it. She was asleep, thats why. Inflammatory and speculative Great blog post, thank you. Downs, born Elizabeth Diane Frederickson, was a 27-year-old divorced postal worker when she pulled up outside a hospital in Oregon in May 1983. I actually do not know what really happened. Thats why Diane wouldnt agree to marry unless Knick first signed a premarital agreement that when they divorced, Knick would take nothing from their marriage. And Robert Knickerbocker became one of her lovers. We cant. She always seems to have not a very close contact with reality. But my beef is with the interference by the media, TV shows and Ann Rule. Criminalist James Pex was pretty clear about this. He hired Jim Jagger on the 1st of June 1983, 11 days after the shooting. The fact that the accused in this case was atypical, makes her the perfect target. The popular TV movie Small Sacrifices was based on Ann Rules book and it painted a horrid picture of the mother accused of shooting her children on Old Mohawk Road. How asinine. Diane Downs' ex husband, Steve Downs, lost a lot in May 1983 when his ex wife shot their three children, following their divorce in 1980. It was not the right gun. Hi Nanette, it is not a matter of being gullible. Right?? But Ann Rules utterly biased account is an insult to investigative journalism and there seems to be very reasonable doubt here. This website supports restorative justice, so of course it leans towards sentences that are not life without parole if it is supported by a warden and mental health specialists. I simply state facts that did not or would not come out at the time or blatant misconduct from a legal system that is supposed to be based on innocent until proven guilty. Ann Rule has always been sensationalist, and her books were almost unreadable at the end of her publishing days. She signed an affidavit to that effect and wanted the jury informed of it but it was never done. Besides, none of those diagnoses are illegal. Christie was only eight, had suffered gunshot wounds and was in shock. Unfortunately, he hasn't been as outspoken as people expected, considering the gruesome details of the crime committed by her ex-wife. I have plans to go hunting with the husband of one of the alternates.. And so, very quickly, they formed a relationship. They would have tried to reopen the case. What about the facts of the case? The photo of Hugi I used is the one you find when you do a search online for Fred Hugi who prosecuted Diane Downs. I do not care if the bushy haired stranger made no sense or if they could not explain the why of the tragedy, I do not care if she was madly in love with a guy because all that counts is proof and evidence in a court of law, and there was definitely a reasonable doubt. There is only one major problem with your scenario. But I think that in all fairness, many of them dont even know the details of the case and have watched Small Sacrifices instead. Many troubling elements of the case were discovered after the trial, but there was enough during the proceedings to be asking questions. Tis why at 10 years old I was hearing about this case in Ohio, and family members talked about it around me.it hit with great force that way. I refer you to this section of the blog: They claimed to have found two lead cartridges in Dianes rifle at home that supposedly matched the ones used during the crime. She is supposed to be locked up for murder, etc. Then they just got shut out. And on this site, I mention that I take a restorative approach. She was not given one inch of presumption of innocence. Basically, I dont believe the site owner has produced enough proof of anything. Steve was the one who left Diane because he believed that Stephen Daniel, known as Danny, was the result of an extramarital affair that Diane had. The innocence project gets so many requests and they have limited resources. Because she seemed "aloof". The guy should have walked away from the case or from adopting them. Not meaning to sound disrespectful, but you seem to be doing what you accuse Ann Rule of doing. Rule sued the Seattle Weekly after they published the article titled , Ann Rule promotes her books as true crime stories so to this day, viewers believe that the book and the movie titled, This reminds me of what a jail counselor named Rachel Roth said at the trial of Debra Milke , They already had made up their mind that Diane was the perpetrator so they laughed off the idea of the , When I hear some people say that they would have liked to smack that smirk off Dianes face when she interacted with the cops or the media, I say. She unwillingly followed the cops in spite of being in pain and not wanting to leave the premises. I accept that it is sometimes necessary but I believe in rehabilitation. time it was the situation was down. This is what Mrs Downs had to say about the situation. It was obvious to the cops and the prosecution because they proceeded to get her daughter to testify against her because they had nothing to prove she was the shooter. They hardly investigated any other lead after a couple of weeks. It was the story of Diane Downs. Fingerprints at the crime scene were not produced by the State. This is also what the state did to her. One of the jurors finally declared we started as a group and finished as a group., He also said we dont want to put pressure on the group, we dont want to end up bickering. As it was getting dark and the young ones fell asleep in the car, their mother decided to head home. Thank you for presenting a side of the story & case apart from the usual narrative. As an adoptive parent I cant even imagine trying to justify to my daughter our adopting her if we had in any way been a part of the case to terminate her from her bio family. The gun presented at trial being the wrong one is a fact. It goes on and on. Maybe she didnt want to admit she was there for drugs, but you need a really tiny brain to worry about that in such a situation. The lawsuit against Ann Rule was thrown out as unfounded because after reading her book they could find no inconsistencies She sat thru the entire trial AND used actual court transcripts. What about the terror of being interrogated by strangers and separated from her family? What followed was a tragedy subject to many interpretations. But showing no remorse is part of claiming her innocence and part of the vicious circle of parole hearings. Hugi did not want that. Except after the idea was subsequently planted in his head only to be alluded to in court, in spite of an agreement to never mention the subject. It became more about despising Diane Downs than investigating fairly. When Diane had failed to mention it herself, he even informed them that she had bought a .22 caliber shotgun in Arizona, just before she had left for Oregon. Robert and Diane even decided toget matching rose tattoos, but as soon as the ink on her tattoo was dry, he refused to get his done. So until today, people still don't know much about him, and his whereabouts remain a mystery. Its a rather large part of the story. The only reason they kept her in prison even if she had all the right documentation and support, is because she is high profile. Ryan is still in his thirties and still building an excellent reputation in the industry. Everything I outlined should be public knowledge. In Rules book, Diane is portrayed as a horrible selfish mother but her family and friends saw another version; she lovedher childrendearly and worked hard to be a good provider. Are her parents still living (I know they were a few years ago)? Rule sued the Seattle Weekly after they published the article titled Ann Rules Sloppy Storytelling, but she lost and had to make restitution. They believed the testimony of her former boyfriends who were far from stellar individuals. He was instead a result of an affair Diane had with a married man. (Yes, speculative). Check your inbox to be the first to know the hottest news. The american system often reminds me of what Charles Dickens talked about in his novels. She was fighting back and they did not like it. One should also wonder why their biological father who was so eager to bash his ex on the stand was not given custody, and did not stay in contact with his two remaining children. Parker Schnabel's net worth in 2023: Is he the richest on Gold Rush? However, in 1980, the couple divorced. I mean if a guy admits to killing children over and over, shouldnt we pay attention to that? They rarely get a break. If there is one thing Diane knew about her lover, is that he was fickle and did not like trouble of any kind. The Diane Downs' Case Was no Small Sacrifice On May 19, 1983, Elizabeth Diane Downs and her three small children were shot on a country road near Springfield, Oregon. It wasnt simply her demeanor that got her convicted. Is it too late to respond to this? I remember when Diane shot her kids and there are some facts Id like to correct from your blog. Dianes parents had high hopes for her future, a future that didnt involve Steve, so they disapproved of their relationship. Also on old footage of the trial, as there was no cameras aloud, the drawing of Christie Downs from court artist also complies with the testimony given in the book, as far as her pain and crying. In case you did not read the blog: During Dianes examination at trial, Fred Hugi said in front of the jury, in the form of a question, that she had been diagnosed as a deviant sociopath. To Lisa Griggs The jurors had doubts. It did not matter that they had no evidence; they did not like her attitude and she was going to pay for it: opinion, not fact And other inmates were released with worst backgrounds. statement regarding the effects of the childrens medications while in hospital should acknowledge where the blogger obtained information about the side effects.). 1st, you came back from a trip? They should have stayed out of it instead of contributing to her revictimization. Just my opinion. The previous video you sent me shows a Jagger pretty animated and involved in the defense of his client. And, when she got assigned to the mail routes in the city of Cottage Grove, Oregon, as a part of her job with the U.S. postal service, he didnt have any qualms with her taking the children. In the end, it is scary how media becomes some kind of Roman circus where people is thrown in order to become a source of business. A. They should have left her alone. Back in Phoenix, Arizona, in Moon Valley High School, Steve Downs met Elizabeth Diane for the first time. The problem was, Diane has a long-documented history of adversely reacting to tranquilizing drugs. Phenobarbital was administered alongside the Dilantin. Pros. That is pure bullshit. And she would have been under supervision. I have no idea whether or not she was guilty of the crime. As soon as Diane was found guilty, Hugi demanded that Diane be evaluated by a psychiatrist before sentencing so they could declare her a dangerous offender and give her a stiffer sentence. Steve was among the few individuals who saw Elizabeth Diane as a beautiful young lady rather than an outsider. This article is about due process and the legal right to a fair trial for everyone. Yet, that is exactly what the videotape showsDiane laughing hysterically about hurting her arm. In fact, what investigator Tracy had written in his notes is that the heart monitor jumped because of excitement or intense fear. Evidence from a ballistics expert. I think that she has done enough time and should be released. There were posters. Diane recanted the stories about her dad who vehemently denied them. A conviction founded on lies is no conviction at all. Page 50 of Case History. Speculative? They dont need to be adopted and have their entire identity changed. The underlying basis of this article. Why on earth would anyone recommend leaving the kids with the grandparents? This is a conflict of interest. Maybe I'm dramatic but I no longer want to watch it . They should have taken the time necessary to find enough evidence. I agree with your comment. Re Diane Downs I invite reading Synopsis quite similar to above: OREGONs Juridical Small Sacrifices They rarely are, especially in the US. She had a bullet wound in the arm, and the three kids in the back of the blood-soaked car had all been shot at close range. During Dianes examination at trial, Fred Hugi said in front of the jury, in the form of a question, that she had been diagnosed as a , Anne Rule made a big deal of a brass unicorn engraved with the childrens names that Diane had purchased. Posted by October 30, 2021 apush gilded age test on why didn't steve downs get custody The way it was. The judge instructed them to continue on to force a verdict. One of the more bizarre scenes in this farce of an investigation was about to unfold. This case had many similarities to the Alice Crimminsstory. Her 7-year old daughter Cheryl died but her 3-year old son Danny and her 8-year old daughter Christie survived. Not our place to decide. On May 19, 1983, Diane and her kids visited a friend to look at her new horse, and then went for a drive; not at all unusual for this family not living according to middle class rules. 6. The proverbial expression It takes two to tango applies here. She says she was outside the car n watched the man shoot her children n then the only adult n person who could tell police about him only gets a shot in the arm n takes time to bandage her arm. Her quest for love had landed her into an unstable and loveless marriage. From what Ive read, she gets a parole hearing every decade and the next time in 2030 she will be 75. 1) Gunshot residue/blood splatter. But, their marriage was far from what either of them had expected. They were put in an impossible situation. Nobody had any reason for a conspiracy of this magnitude over a literal nobody. If you had commented on one of the elements contained in the blog, it might have been enlightening. What is known for a fact, is, Prosecutor Fred Hugi took physical custody of Christie and Danny shortly after Christies confessions to her school mates, and he officially adopted them in the summer of 1986. It sounds pretty fair to me. According to Detective Welch, Steve Downs followed Diane to Oregon, they fought and Steves rage took the last step on the path hed been treading for a long time. These are no facts its partial truths and conjecture. Why was no one in the family given the right to adopt them. Q. And the interrogations were not tapedand barelydocumented. If it was not such a high profile case, Diane Downs would have been paroled a long time ago: speculative, Ill stop there. The fact that there was a rush to judgment, an investigation targeting only one result and a media coverage often presenting lies is very bothersome. It was also said at trial that the shooter would have been left handed, which was not the case for Diane. Take your smugness elsewhere, at long last. A fair trial is a right in this country, not a judicial suggestion. The children should have been receiving therapy throughout. If the goal was to get rid of them, why didnt she emulate her lesser half in this matter? By the time Danny was born, they were having intense arguments about infidelity that Steve got convinced that he wasnt his biological son. Christie was the primary witness in the case against her mother. Hysteria. She attacked her husband and ripped his neck open in a jealous rage (Appendix 81, page 1520), tearing from his neck the gold chain he still wore from his first marriage (a gift from his first wife). Around 1 in 20 residents in Arkansas and Tennessee were missed during the 2020 census, and four other U.S. states had significant undercounts of their populations which could shortchange them Most people negotiate the ups and downs of . They should have taken their timeto investigatethis case thoroughly and without prejudice. Judges are subject to certain ethical standards and have a duty to be impartial. It means you dont orphan the kids. The pilots we did dealt with Japan going over the quotas of hunted whales and a company dumping toxic waste into the ocean But it didn't work out because the stock footage they were using. (He WAS shot in the back remember). She had no priors and no history of violence in prison. As was his habit, Knick failed to take into consideration what Diane or his wife had to say on the matter. Actor Robert Blake was found not guilty of the shooting murder of his wife. Instead of blaming societal problems and working at finding solutions, prison always seem to be their option. woman quot~ unquote, do you remember anything like that? You left and you and Diane Downs spent an evening at a motel? Isnt is odd how something we are exposed to as children can stick in our memory? I was also stunned that she took the reports of all of Dianes ( mostly married) ex lovers as absolute truth and never once questioned that they might have been lying and retrospectively minimising their feelings for Diane to protect themselves. Blood spatter is not an exact science, and is interpreted differently by experts. If you think you would have more influence arguing for better relationships with Mexico at a Donald Trump rally in Mexico, why bother? According to the State, ballistics evidence proved that Diane Downs was guilty. Found the internet! And their plan worked. After six weeks in Oregon where the children were happily spending time with their grandparents while Diane worked her postal route, the incident happened on a dark road that led to Diane being accused of murder and attempted murder. Only in Hollywood and in Ann Rules books, would you find such fantasy. Because she was failing quite miserably at remaining pure and chaste, she was expelled after only a year, and thus, she returned to her parents home in Arizona. They sure forgot to tell us about her pulse racing during these sessions. It was such a high profile case and she was found guilty by the media and the court so people are afraid to touch this one. If you use this mixed water, you can lift off a gunpowder stain.. Did you read her statements to the parole board in 2008? She was the star witness in her mom's prosecution and her testimony helped convict her. http://www.salem-news.com/articles/july152013/midnight-med-tb-2.php why didn't steve downs get custody. She was no mother of the year, I will grant them that, but a trial is supposed to be based on evidence. This is Budhu's story, as told to Kelly Burch . It could be argued that he developed a relationship with the children and genuinely wanted them to join his family. A conviction founded on lies is no conviction at all. Page 50 of Case History As her brother mentioned, it would not be that farfetched for his sister to stop for someone considering that she was a person who lacked impulse control and the era. But Diane was not the one dragging Knick out of Charlenes bed every morning intent on making or breaking his relationship with another woman. But the guy who said to several people that he was the shooter happens to resemble the sketch they came up with at the time for a reason. While that makes her technically eligible for parole at some point (in her case 2009) it does not actually mean she has an end date or a release date. I am not sure of the exact timing of Dianes accusations but the Downs family did not only include the grandparents and they were never considered even before this nonsense. I cant believe anyone even believes or even follows you. Some cases are so one sided that you feel like exposing or at least, discussing the other side. http://sputniknews.com/us/20150620/1023613662.html#ixzz3djEXlSAC // The Prison State of America Dec 28, 2014 Chris Hedges, http://www.truthdig.com/report/item/the_prison_state_of_america_20141228 He separated from his wife and was going to follow Diane who, by now, had decided to move and work in Oregon to be closer to her parents. The grandparents were babysitting the children often and had several children who were well adjusted. She has come a long way. That her child was basically forced to admit that she saw her mom shoot them? During Dianes examination at trial, Fred Hugi said in front of the jury, in the form of a question, that she had been diagnosed as a deviant sociopath.. So, what is Steve's story? Lise lasalle you mention THIS When she (Diane) resisted, he shot her kids and struggled with her. Exactly Libby why did they say during the trial that he saw his mom? So yes I think she did it, I think ration left her a long before she did itI think post pardum played in this, I think, she was scattered all over the map.againjust hearing it in her own words. Years later, Christie was heard saying by classmates that she did not know who shot her. The implication was not only cruel, in the light of what Diane was suffering, it was also clear. No one bothered with these details so I did. Danny and Christie survived the attack while middle child, Cheryl, died from her injuries at the time. Foote denied the motion and declared you have an attorney, use him.. That says it all. I think that the US system is barbaric This was all logged in Christies hospital reports and is found in the Appendix of the petition filed in Federal Court in 1996 in the section Hospital Reports.. The unicorn, the song, her personality. It kinda scared me, the thought that mommy could shoot me, like this mommy did. The fact that Dianes injury was way more serious than they tried to pretend? I go fishing with a jurors husband. Instead of talking about her being locked up for so long, answer some very legitimate questions regarding this case. The next day, on June 16, 1983, CSD terminated Dianes visitations with her children altogether. Page 10 of Case History. Seems like she was her worst enemy. She complained about it, but that does not mean she did not suffer for her kids. ANNE RULES BOOK IS A LIE, ,ALL MADE UP CRAP. But the birth of little Danny did not make this bad boy change his stripes; he remained a cad and a destabilizing force in their lives. At the time, among 49 prisoners denied parole, the board had given only four inmates, including Downs, a 10-year wait. "I knew within 30 minutes of talking with that woman that she was guilty": Surgeon who helped save one of Diane Downs' kids in 1983 after she shot her recalls chilling interaction. Dianes daughter started saying that she did not know who shot them right when she got adopted. This is a scenario pretty hard to believe, but as they say, reality can sometimes be stranger than fiction. The State produced a witness (Ms. Patterson) to testify that Diane Downs entered the hospital bathroom, left the door open, and ran water in the sink (Appendix 87, page 476). Children imitate their parents every move. Will Cheryl ever be let out of her grave? Hey Jace, I was not going to post your insulting comments but I decided to let the last sentence fly so that I could answer it. I personally disagree with that practice but it is common. I had never heard of this case before I read her book (Im not from or do not live in the USA), but I found myself constantly despairing at the authors unfounded judgements and wild suppositions. We could say that it was suggestive on his part, but considering how this trial was conducted, I tend to believe it happened. Diane was diagnosed as being bipolar and subsequently diagnosed by a psychiatrist before sentencing. Downs: And there was a big reward, too. Indeed, Diane Down's murder case was a shocker for detectives. And the fatal shooting of her children by her wife in 1983 didn't do much to put him in the limelight. Steve knew Danny was not his biological child and left Downs. So not addressing the content of the blog and rambling about everything else while asking for a disclaimer is nailing it? Where to begin? Diane was sentenced to life plus 50 years. Not speculative? Page 35 of Case History. Also, she became pregnant without Steve Downs' permission. Everything was in the bag and ready for trial. Where is the blood spatter on Diane? I do not discuss her guilt or innocence because this is not what the blog is about, but I personally hope she is released one day. There was never a real motive for the crime even if the State insisted that Diane wanted to be free to pursue her love interest; using her journals to support theirclaim. But you are right to say that it is my site. 2.Diane herself has stated that the shooter was outside the car and shot THROUGH the window, no blood spatter. Legally speaking, we do not go after people because they look evil or crazy. After Diane got divorced from her husband in 1980, she had taken up a job at the U.S. postal service office, and that's where she first met him. It is because she is a high profile person. They claimed to have found two lead cartridges in Dianes rifle at home that supposedly matched the ones used during the crime. Its more understandable now, after all this time but it has done her so much harm, then and now The poor jury went along and Jagger did not put much ofa defense anyway. Wasnt it speculative on their part?

Fm21 Strikers For Championship, Why Do People Die With Their Mouth Open, Articles W